William Lane Craig willful ignorance promoting pulpit prostitute

First we should watch just how the twisted and deluded apologist presents his case.

Below is a particularly interesting argument in that a logical concept can be twisted into use for the promotion of an irrational belief.

The thought “the absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence” is a logical concept, in this case it is used to defend religion. This defense can be referred to as the diamond in the desert defense and it is quite common. Diamond in the desert is the claim that you cannot say with complete certainty that no diamond exists in the sands of a desert without first searching and sifting every grain of sand to identify any possible diamonds. Any person who has dabbled in logic regardless of any religious position can identify this as rational and reasonable.

We come into conflict when using this defense and reviewing the Abrahamic religious texts. Only the willfully ignorant superstitionist or disingenuous apologists (often using pious fraud as a shield) would claim the texts are flawless and contain no contradictions. A reading of the Christian texts show an “all or nothing” position, and in that position any single flaw that is provable negates the entire mythology, in effect it removes any “desert diamond” defense due to the claim of infallibility. Mr. W L Craig of course knows and understands this but chooses the disingenuous path, any religion could use the “desert diamond” defense rejecting infallibility but in this case Mr. Craig chooses Christianity because it is the most profitable for apologists manipulators.



W L Craig is an obvious pathological liar and a pompous parasitic narcissist, one of the worst pulpit prostitutes for profit, farming the feebleminded.

Below a simple refutation of the Argument from Innumeracy, Argument To The Future combination.