I wasn't asking if you beileved there was a conspiracy, or that Osama wasn't really dead, or even that the governemnt was covering something up, just, do you have any doubt at all about what we were told happened.
Well, we were told Osama was armed at the time of the raid that killed him, but now, wait a minute, no, the White house now says, he WAS NOT ARMED. How did Bin Laden resist then? We are also being informed that there WERE NO SECURITY GUARDS at the Osama compound, which is just more than a little curious for someone with supposed millions at his command, who is also wanted by the most powerful military force on earth. Makes you wonder just a little, doesn't it, on the swift disposal of the body?
So, why wasn't Bin Laden taken alive? It begins to look like he was shot at close range in the head execution style, which means Obama ordered his execution, and there will be no trial, no rule of law, no justice truly served as it is supposed to be under a democracy. But, no questions please, because if you question the government's story (which has already changed from what we told just hours ago) then you're just a conspiracy nut.
And please remember, we were told the following:
The U.S. Navy SEAL team that killed Osama bin Laden Sunday in Pakistan would have taken al Qaeda's leader in alive if it was possible, White House counterterrorism adviser John Brennan said Monday.
"If we had the opportunity to take bin Laden alive, if he didn't present any threat, the individuals involved were able and prepared to do that," Brennan told reporters during a press conference.-White House: We would have taken bin Laden alive
So, Osama himself wasn't armed, there were no security guards protecting him, but somehow, it wasn't possible to take him alive?
Still no doubts about the official story, mocker?