Monday, February 22, 2010

John Loftus debates babbling fool

Posted by
Here. Enjoy!

I'm actually listening to it right now. The consensus seems to be that D'Souza actually "won" (in the audience's eyes). Might have some thoughts when I'm done. D'Souza is a babbling fool regardless. ;)

UPDATE: Bah, D'Souza's arguments are so jaw-droppingly horrible that I don't think I can listen to this crap from beginning to end.
at 11:33 PM
Labels: , ,

4 comments:

  1. macFebruary 23, 2010 at 8:13 AM

    I was a regular commenter when D'Souza had his blog on AOL.

    Claiming he "won" the debate i a favorite tactic of his, regardless of the actual outcome.

    It's a pretty easy guess that his arguments are lame when I dumb ol' country boy like me can shred them to bits ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  2. BudFebruary 23, 2010 at 8:22 AM

    I attended the D'Souza/Loftus debate, and I have to say that Dinesh beat John hands down in 1) number of jokes told, and 2) number of words used, and that's it. If that's what it takes to win a debate, then our entire concept of "debate" is flawed.

    ReplyDelete
  3. CorkFebruary 23, 2010 at 1:59 PM

    Personally, I don't get how a theist could ever win a debate. Their argument is always "nobody know how we got here, therefore my preferred sky pixie did it."

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ben ArzateFebruary 23, 2010 at 3:48 PM

    D'Souza's arguments are so horrible. It was actually his really poor essay on Kant and faith that he did that pushed me from being a weak atheist to a strong one.

    ReplyDelete

If the post you are commenting on is more than 30 days old, your comment will have to await approval before being published. Rest assured, however, that as long as it is not spam, it will be published in due time.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Related Posts with Thumbnails