If you don't believe it's ever okay to forcibly resist anything that government does, no matter how evil, then don't pretend you believe in unalienable rights.
That question, even without an answer, makes most “law-abiding taxpayers” go into knee-jerk conniptions. The indoctrinated masses all race to see who can be first, and loudest, to proclaim that it is NEVER okay to forcibly resist “law enforcement.” In doing so, they also inadvertently demonstrate why so much of human history has been plagued by tyranny and oppression.-When Should You Shoot A Cop
A pig website that supports the police state that America has become "responded" to the original Copblock article (actually the flyer based on it) here: 'Shoot a cop' flyer surfaces in Ariz.
Copblock responded to the response: “When Should You Shoot a Cop”: A Response To A Response
“The flyer originated from an anti-cop website called copblock.org. They compare all of us to soldiers under Hitler or Lenin. What a load of junk. ” – Schrodingerscat
There is a good correlation there to make this claim. If you review the actions of the police in regards to the current actions they are taking against UNARMED protestors who are simply exercising their First Amendment right to assemble and protest; you can easily see how the actions of the police are aggressing against the rights of sovereign individuals under the guise of “just following orders”.
If… the machine of government… is of such a nature that it requires you to be the agent of injustice to another, then, I say, break the law. ~Henry David Thoreau,On the Duty of Civil Disobedience, 1849
So, the fact that you, the police, are willingly and enthusiastically seeking to engage in violence against unarmed people exercising their rights, philosophically, do they not have the right to defend themselves, even up to deadly force if deadly force is being imposed on them?
What we see now are the police “doing their job”, just as the SS and other tyrannical forces did to keep the people under their control. Not all cops fall into this category, but what we are seeing now shows that there is major corruption in the field of law enforcement as a whole.
“They were raised to be whiners. if they had 1/10th the focus of the TEA Party, they would be a force to be reckoned with. But they don’t. That is why they will be perpetually dismissed and will ultimately resort to the only the thing they understand… anarchy.” -Interceptor828
Despite the lack of depth in concepts outside the Left vs. Right (probably from lack of education on the matter), the critique of anarchy does not apply here. Anarchy would still have a level of miscreants as our current system; however, it would provide the individual more access to to protect and defend themselves without overbearing “red-tape” that resides in what you consider a “justice system”. However, while your assertions may be true to a point, it is your attitude toward them that affects your judgment to treat them fairly. You and others have been able to dehumanize them, blinded by the glare from your badge or riot shield, and because of that you haven’t questioned your role and position in the equation. Take a look a what you carry in your hand versus what they carry in theirs and tell me what the difference is…. then tell us who the “violent” ones are.