Wednesday, March 5, 2014
Climate Risks
Posted by
Nick
Anthropogenic global warming is a scientific theory but it is also a
publicity campaign. Central to that campaign is the claim that the
science is entirely settled, hence that anyone who rejects any part of
the conclusion is either ignorant or corrupt. The rhetorical strategy
that supports that claim, one example of which was discussed in a previous post,
consists of blurring the distinctions among the claims used to support
the conclusion that unless something is done to sharply reduce world
output of CO2, very bad things will happen. Anyone who criticizes any
link in the chain is labeled a "denier," with the implication that he
denies one or both of the most solidly supported claims—that
temperatures are trending up or that humans are in part responsible.-David Friedman
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
So Steve, you call yourself moral and you ignore my comment policy? Bye-bye to your comment, Steveie the hypocrite, you were warned!
ReplyDelete