Showing posts with label Politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Politics. Show all posts

Saturday, September 22, 2012

Libertarian Mom Takes On Two Party System

Betsy is running for US Congress for these reasons: to reduce the size and scope of the Government, to restore the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights, to reduce federal spending by 50%, to end the wars (including the absurd “war on drugs”) and to expose the ponzi scheme which is our Keynesian economy. Her positions are very clear, with individual liberty as the source. Her goal is to magnify the growing Liberty movement – the one that champions individual freedom, personal responsibility, and small government – all under the umbrella of non-aggression. Let your neighbor be, and just be.-http://votebetsy.com/

via The Victory Report

VoteBetsy.com

Sunday, July 29, 2012

Mitt Romney vs Ron Paul on Medical Marijuana Legalization

The evil statist (and lying, dirty, rotten crony capitalist) Mitt Romney, when confronted with someone who clearly has a medical condition that they say is helped by using marijuana for medical reasons, displays not the least bit of compassion for another human being. He instead gives his robotic response, as if he's not really listening (which he isn't) and shows himself without a soul, and as the lifeless ruling class machine (and ready enforcer of the almighty Federal Government's anti-human, anti-liberty "laws") he is...

Contrast Mitt the Loser (here's hoping he goes down to defeat at the hands of that other evil statist, Barack Obama) with the real, the compassionate, the true human being and genuine lover of liberty and opponent of big government, Ron Paul.

Sunday, January 29, 2012

I Hope This Means They'd Toss Out Their Own....

We always hear in polling data that Congress has an extremely low approval rating (currently at 13%) but that people would re-elect their own congressman. Maybe that's about to change with a majority now stating they want ALL of them thrown out of office:

The majority of registered voters — 56% — would vote out every single member of the House and Senate if there was a ballot measure to do so, according to a new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll.-Majority of Americans want to vote out every single member of Congress: poll

Sunday, January 8, 2012

Interesting Analysis of Mitt "Ken Doll" Romney's Actual Nomination Prospects

...to win the nomination outright, Romney does not just have to win primaries/caucuses, he has to win MORE THAN FIFTY PERCENT of the delegates. Otherwise, he’ll end up in a brokered convention, in which anything could happen. Given that he didn’t even break 25% in Iowa, may not break 40% in New Hampshire, and is stuck around 30-35% in South Carolina, that’s may be a pretty tall order. The key numbers to look at are Romney’s vote percentages as compared to those of all the religious right candidates combined (i.e. Santorum, Gingrich, Perry, & Bachmann), since those four voting blocs will coalesce into one single anti-Romney bloc by the time Super Tuesday rolls around and the winner-take-all contests begin. And by that metric it doesn’t look good for Romney. He would have lost Iowa 25%-53%, would still win NH, but would lose South Carolina by double digits. Until he starts breaking 40% somewhere outside of NH, I’m going to remain highly skeptical of his chances at actually winning the nomination.-Mitt the Loser

Tuesday, January 3, 2012

Hannity and the Scary Clowns

Watched a few minutes of Sean Hannity's Fox "News" interviews of the Iowa Republican candidates last night. Caught some comments of two of the scariest loser clowns, Rick Santorum and Michele Bachmann. Santorum should be in a sanatorium for proposing thoughtlessly an unprovoked attack against Iran. This pro-death asswipe is supposed to be a Catholic? Sick! He was asked what he thought about Ron Paul calling him a liberal. His response (and I paraphrase) was that Ron Paul was from the "Dennis Kucinich foreign policy left-wing" of the Democratic Party, so how can Ron Paul call him a liberal? Well, maybe we should just quote Ron Paul to find out what he meant:

"He voted to double the size of the Department of Education. He voted to expand Medicare and add free drugs for senior citizens and he has voted for foreign aid. Those are not conservative principles. Seventy-seven percent of the American people are opposed to foreign aid and Rick Santorum has voted for it every time it's come down."-Ron Paul: Santorum is 'very liberal'


Sean Hannity the neocon fool just continued on after that without pursuing what exactly Ron Paul was talking about. As a militarist scumbag, Hannity really only considers someone "conservative" if they support a massive and bloated military budget and aggression all over the world. He seems not to care about much else, and doesn't seem to mind a candidate who is otherwise a big spender of your tax dollars. The irony is, even on defense and war and foreign policy, Ron Paul IS MORE conservative than anyone else running. You have to go back to before the conservative movement was taken over by neocon loons, but still...


And speaking of loons, Bachmann said Ron Paul would do nothing about Iran until Iran launched a nuclear weapon at the U.S. In other words, until Iran decided to commit suicide, for why else would they launch one warhead at America, the strongest military power on earth with a nuclear arsenal large enough to destroy Iran completely? Again, however, Hannity didn’t challenge this nonsense at all.


But Ron Paul, of course, is the one with loony, “fringe” ideas.

Saturday, December 17, 2011

Ron Paul and Joe Rogan with Jay Leno





Joe Rogan of 'Fear Factor' Endorses Ron Paul


Rogan called Paul "the only guy who is saying anything that makes any sense whatsoever."-Rep. Ron Paul has picked up the endorsement of the baddest reality show host on TV


Rogan also makes sense on the ultimate uselessness of voting and the "democratic" system when he says "At this point in my life, I feel like voting for president is a lot like rooting on professional wrestling. It might make you feel better, but I'm not sure it effects the outcome that much."

Wednesday, November 30, 2011

Who Can You Trust?

Q: How can you tell when a politician is lying?

A: When his lips are moving.


via LRC Blog

Thursday, October 20, 2011

David Corn's 999plan.com

He offered to sell the domain name to Herman Cain, but received no response from Mr. Federal Reserve Pizza Man.

The Tax Policy Center has done yet another analysis of Herman Cain's 9-9-9 plan, and guess what? Unless you're really rich, your taxes will go up! If you earn, say, $50,000 per year, you currently pay about 14.3% of your income in federal taxes. Under Cain's plan, you'll pay 23.8%. Whee! And if you make the big bucks? Well, millionaires currently pay about 32.9% of their income in federal taxes. Under Cain's plan, they'll pay 17.9%. Ka-ching!







www.999plan.com



Well, since Cain thinks if you're not rich or you're without a job, it's your fault, no wonder his pro big government plan helps out those worthy wealthy and takes even more from the undeserving non-rich earning a disgraceful working class income. But hey, don't get mad at Herman "Big Government" Cain. He's only trying to help you by pushing you to become rich so you'll pay less in taxes. Don't you get it? Herman Cain wants you to be rich (and it's easy, anyone can do it; after all, if you're not rich, you have no one to blame but yourself)!

Monday, October 17, 2011

The Media Blackout of Ron Paul

Of course the state-run media doesn't want to cover the only candidate that would bring real change to Washington. The statist shills that laughably call themselves "journalists" are instead quite happy giving coverage to the same old tired "conservative" and "liberal" candidates and playing the Republican/Democrat musical chairs game that keeps the status quo of welfare and warfare going, no matter which party sits down in the chairs of power when the political music stops, unless, God forbid, Ron Paul were to win and upset the apple cart and actually shrink the size of their master the almighty state! The statist "mainstream" media will do all in their failing, collapsing power to stop that from happening.

That's why they must promote the Herman Cains and the Mitt Romneys, who will, if elected to replace Obama, shuffle the chairs on deck but otherwise continue to preside over the sinking ship of government as if the state's days were not numbered.


Ron Paul Media Blackout Confirmed

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

Herman Cain...Magic Negro?

...some Republicans have decided that they need a "magic negro" of their own. After all, what could counteract the uplifting post-racial appeal of the first half-black, half-American president so well as a presidential candidate who is an authentic American black man, with no unsettling questions about his birth, his Social Security number, his college records, his religion and even his name?


...Herman Cain should not be the Republican Party's candidate for president...

...both his economic philosophy and his employment record are quite literally Communist. In the fifth of the "10 Planks" of the Communist Manifesto, Karl Marx demanded "Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly." In the United States, credit has been centralized in an exclusive government monopoly granted to the Federal Reserve; Mr. Cain was the deputy chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City from 1992-1994 and the chairman from 1995-1996.-Vox Day: The false hope of Herman Cain




Herman Cain, one-time CEO of Godfather's Pizza, announces his candidacy for the Republican Party's presidential nomination:

Thursday, May 12, 2011

Poll: Americans Want A Third Party

More often these days it's common to find a voter who doesn't identify with the Democrat or Republican parties. And the desire for another choice isn't new.







Interesting that 52% of Republicans (and a whopping 60% of the Tea Party) want a 3rd party, but only a third of Democrats do. I think the reason may be that Democrats are satisfied with the status quo, because no matter which of the two major parties is in power, the trend is in the same direction, with government growing ever larger and more intrusive, especially at the Federal level. And Democrats love big government.



Republicans, on the other hand, while they've cheered on an insane (and insanely expensive) foreign policy since 9/11 (and they may be starting to come to their senses on that) really expect change when they send Republicans to Washington, it's just that they never get it. There is a good chunk of the Republican base that really wants a smaller government, plus a large and growing libertarian element within the party as well. Ron Paul's popularity is part of this rebellion against the Tweedledee vs Tweedledum choice we are given in almost every election.



The misguided part of all of this desire for a different political party, is that politics will not be the ultimate solution to the tyranny of the state.

Sunday, April 17, 2011

Possibly Gay Poet Inspires Rick Santorum's Campaign Slogan

Rick "homosexuality is the same as incest" Santorum backs away from a "gay" campaign slogan, which is as moronic as his authoritarian statements on gay rights. Consenting adults, according to past Santorum statements, don't have the right to engage in sex in the privacy of their own homes. He's just another big government asshole (and with his obsession with gay sex, his is no doubt a big, wide, gaping one) pretending he is a conservative.

Former Republican Sen. Rick Santorum announced Wednesday that he was forming an exploratory committee for a possible presidential run. His slogan was, and remains on his website, "Fighting to make America America again."

But it might not be for long. Santorum, a well-known conservative, backed away from the phrase -- saying he had "nothing to do" with it -- after being told it derives from a poem by Langston Hughes.-Rick Santorum says he had 'nothing to do with' campaign slogan taken from Langston Hughes poem

Friday, April 8, 2011

Karl Hess on The Death of Politics

This is not a time of radical, revolutionary politics. Not yet. Unrest, riot, dissent, and chaos notwithstanding, today's politics is reactionary. Both Left and Right are reactionary and authoritarian. That is to say, both are political. They seek only to revise current methods of acquiring and wielding political power. Radical and revolutionary movements seek not to revise but to revoke. The target of revocation should be obvious. The target is politics itself.

Radicals and revolutionaries have had their sights trained on politics for some time. As governments fail around the world, as more millions become aware that government never has and never can humanely and effectively manage men's affairs, government's own inadequacy will emerge, at last, as the basis for a truly radical and revolutionary movement. In the meantime, the radical-revolutionary position is a lonely one. It is feared and hated, by both Right and Left — although both Right and Left must borrow from it to survive.

The Death of Politics



The above was first published in Playboy in 1969. H/t to Lew Rockwell

Friday, March 11, 2011

The Two Party Dictatorship

I don't know if I personally agree on all of the listed issues that are supposedly being blocked, though they may indeed have a majority of popular support, just like currently polls showed that a majority are against raising the debt ceiling once again, though of course, the will of the people in our wonderful "democracy" will be ignored.

The parties also collaborate in every way possible to keep their control of the electoral system. They make it difficult for candidates going outside the two parties to get onto the ballot with restrictive laws and procedures, they gerrymander their districts to favor one party or the other, and they do everything they can to make the actual campaigns as expensive as possible. To top it off, the media helps by ignoring non-party candidates or stereotyping challengers.

Second, their rivalries mean that no meaningful, necessary changes can be implemented…

Each party is constantly jockeying for power, positioning themselves for advantage in each upcoming election. Every action is controlled by political expediency.



POX Manifesto – “We need a new approach to our electoral process”

Monday, February 28, 2011

Willful Ignorance in politics

When David Letterman had Sen. Rand Paul as a guest on his television show, the late night talk host let his liberal faith dictate his own facts.

Related Posts with Thumbnails