Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Foolish Republican Romneybots

The "electability" issue is being used by the media shills for the establishment to create an inevitability to Mitt for Brains as the GOP nominee. The brainless primary voters once again have become mere pawns in the "democracy" game, submitting to the will of their masters, who chose Romney before a single vote was cast.

Ron Paul, of course "can't win" (if you don't vote for him, no, he can't, fools!) and is "unelectable" and can't beat Obama, but yet, CNN's own polling shows otherwise, with Ron Paul tied with Obama in a general election match up: CNN Poll: Obama tied with Romney & Paul in November showdowns

Prediction: If Mitt Romney wins the GOP nomination he will go down in flames against master politician Barack Obama. Either way though, win or lose, the establishment will still be smiling when the smoke of stupidity clears.

Romney the Loser

Republicans sure have short memories. It was just four years ago that they went to the polls in the primaries and elected the most "moderate" and "electable" candidate they could find in the hope that they had a man who was palatable to the general population. Their reward for their unprincipled pragmatism was an ass-kicking in the general election that few Americans will ever forget. John McCain and Sarah Palin certainly won’t forget it.

Four years later, having learned absolutely nothing from the election of 2008, Republican voters are once again lining up behind the most moderate and supposedly "electable" candidate that they can find in the pragmatic hope that they can beat Obama in the general election. They have become so unprincipled and pragmatic, in fact, that they are lining up behind the very man who brought European-style socialized medicine to our fair shores, simply because they have been told that he is more "electable" than anyone else in the field. How they can expect an outcome that’s better than four years ago is difficult to fathom, unless they think that their new moderate’s plastic hair can compensate for his obvious blandness.

In one respect, moreover, the selection of this particular "moderate" is even more ridiculous than the selection of the kooky moderate four years ago. This guy came in second place in the primaries to the "moderate" who got his ass handed to him in the general election. Think about that for a minute. This guy was moderate enough to come in second in the primaries two years ago, when the Republicans first decided to eschew principle and select a moderate, and yet he was deemed less "electable" than the guy who lost so badly.

In other words, if the more "electable" moderate got his ass kicked four years ago, how badly is the second-place moderate going to do this time around?

Here’s a novel idea for Republicans: Vote based upon principle, not based upon whatever the bobble-headed morons in the media establishment say is strategically expedient. Your strategic pragmatism got you nowhere four years ago. Young people and independents in this country are not any more impressed with bland flip-floppers from Massachusetts than they are impressed with nut-job moderates from Arizona. These guys don’t even impress Republicans themselves. If they want a "moderate" who stands for war and socialized medicine, they might as well stick with the moderate, warmongering socialist they already have.

How about nominating someone who has a record of standing up for individual liberty for once? How about nominating someone who believes in the Constitution for once? How about nominating someone who opposes liberal nation-building and warmongering for once? How about voting for a real capitalist for once?

In other words, how about voting based upon your own damn principles for once, instead of voting like pragmatic Trotskyites taking strategic orders from the political-media establishment? Forget this ridiculous, immoral and futile idea of "electability" and vote for Ron Paul and the principles of your own party.-by Mark R. Crovelli at LewRockwell.com (republished under the following: Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Contrary to the false propaganda proclaiming that Dr. Ron Paul is "not electable", his numbers are rising, his support growing and he stands an excellent chance of winning both the GOP nomination and the 2012 presidential race.-Dr. Ron Paul: 6 Reasons He Is Electable and Will Win


  1. Prediction: If Mitt Romney wins the GOP nomination he will go down in flames against master politician Barack Obama. Either way though, win or lose, the establishment will still be smiling when the smoke of stupidity clears.

    I agree, except for the part about Obama being a master politician.

  2. except for the part about Obama being a master politician

    It's all relative. Compared to the Republican buffoons, he is.

  3. I dunno... Romney is a Republican who got elected in Massachusetts. That takes some political prowess.

    I think Romney will lose in 2012 largely because he's out-gunned (Obama has more big-money backing him), because the Republican nominees are doing Obama's job for him at the moment (love the "vulture capitalist" quip), and because I just don't see Republicans rallying around Romney (he's the right-wing John Kerry).


If the post you are commenting on is more than 30 days old, your comment will have to await approval before being published. Rest assured, however, that as long as it is not spam, it will be published in due time.

Related Posts with Thumbnails