The mediocrity and corruption should be obvious

The mediocrity and corruption should be obvious, to some it may never be clear.

Many libertarians, independents, anarchists and many on the left understand the mediocrity and corruption of the government from both false sides Democrat and Republican.

Do differences exist, yes, but only in a superficial way that bodes well for the campaigns. The whores pretend to involve themselves in begging and scraping for votes from the mediocre and ignorant general public all the while rubbing hands in anticipation of the 30 pieces of silver.



When we talk about puppets and masters we are talking about the corrupt, power hungry unorganized oligarchy. The oligarchy of the filthy rich and über powerful, a parasitic class of humans that manipulate the government like a puppet. The reason why so many conspiracy ideas fail under examination is that the government does not give the oligarchy power the government is a tool of the oligarchy a sign of the real power, the oligarchy maintains all the willing servants and pets in government.

The bread and circuses of the two party system do little more than perpetuate an endless campaign, a diversionary distraction presented and promoted to create and increase tensions between members of the ignorant public who suffer under the delusion of different parties.

The general goal is always the same, increase power and increase control, the teams have been assigned different colors and have some differences in the cheers and plays but both exist to make profit and gain control for the presenters. None of the game is to serve the "fans" only confuse and distract them. On all substantive issues both the Republicans, the Democrats along with other political parties and movements are directed by the same masters.

An additional mistake would be to assume that the corporations rule the government when in fact the CEOs serve a rich or powerful elite who demand fealty to their agendas.

Any politician from either party who attempts to counter the agenda is likely to be ruined with scandal or suffer death by propaganda when the oligarchy sicks the established media on them. Both parties clearly cower in the face of corporate pressure. Have the whores in congress, senate, judiciary, and the POTUS Democrat or Republican shown even the slightest resistance to the bidding of the oligarchy and the visible arms of control the, MSM, military, medical, or industrial complex with anything other than a "yes sir, how high sir?"

Not recognizing the puppets for what they are and understand that most of what is popular or politically correct is part of a plan is a sign of willful ignorance or delusional programing.

Is narcissistic, rude, violent and irrational now the norm?

Situational irony

Situational irony as hard-core march by liberals ridiculing that sold-out whore and hack Beck for pointing out hard-core socialists are involved. Not a one aware that the left and right are simply tools.

Proof political whores are puppets

U.S. politicians from both sides are simply useful idiots. The American people who are becoming the butt of the joke, the equally ignorant populace bothers to vote for the oligarchy approved puppets.



Watching that retarded idiot McCain the insane is painful, he was actually close to getting elected president.

Is the left helping same sex marriage?

Is same sex marriage even an issue, sadly government makes it so by stepping into an area it thinks it needs to control.

We see and endless parade of the statist religionist right spewing drivel about the evils of gayness, but where is the left, supporting the statist position of course.

Marriage or the union of people in a serious committed relationship is a personal issue, the domain of consenting adults who decide to rise above a simple relationship of sex to one of partnership love and responsibility. A partnership recognized by most as more than just a string of romps in the hay.



The sad part of course is when the left wants to increase the original grab for power and tax income to officially “sanction” a partnership. The problem becomes in defining what a marriage is and just who has access to what benefits may be a part of that partnership.

Few outside of the far religious right would deny that a committed adult relationship should give the partners the rights of visitation, inheritance, medical, insurance contracts, and powers of attorney where appropriate. Even the attempt a defining a marriage cheapens the entire affair to a certificate stamped by some uninterested public servant. Getting government out of the quagmire would actually help, it would allow the social groups the freedom to define personal relationships as desired.

Problems arise when the immature and irrational left feels it necessary to let the issue fall into the hands of the religionists with rhetoric that cheapens the debate to an issue based on sex or sex acts.

Not too long ago I posted this. Change the world? Global, Local, or Personal?

Family or the personal definition of “a family" is one of the reasons I reject “legal” government recognized (and taxed) “marriage” (and “family”). Who you call or claim is your “significant other” is the personal business of the individual or individuals involved. I believe it requires two (or more) adult cognizant and willing (not under duress, coercion or force) and consenting (willing to accept the terms of the personal/social contract) human partners/participants.

For the silly and stupid wanting to point out the “human only” part, I do not recognize ownership of an animal as valid to replace consent. Until valid, provable, repeatable communication with any creature and humans is established this is not an option. Until communication and self-awareness along with the clear concept of freedom of refusal is established I consider any relationship invalid I use this same reason for the refusal to recognize pedophilia as a valid relationship.

Some of the juvenile left seems to want to equate marriage with sex acts and even the love of livestock falling into the hands of the irrational religionists. The idiots are not your friends, obviously the title of leftist is used as a cloak to cover idiocy and deflect criticism as if it is some shield of political correctness over the insanity.

Statist conservative whores for his masters

Statist “Conservative” political whore and lickspittle oligarchy defender Newt Gingrich takes the “conservative” position on “wet” politics.

His masters should be proud.

Idiocracy, only one reason for a crash in the future

Idiocracy on the way...

The literature and music of a century or more ago is clearly not the work of marginally retarded minds, and its abundance indicates those who wrote it were not rare exceptions in a generally dull population. Consider genius in the past. Most people considered geniuses have IQs in the vicinity of 150, or 3 1/3 standard deviations above the mean IQ of 100. In a population with a mean IQ of 100, individuals with IQs of 150 occur with a frequency of about one in 2300 people—they're rare, but every medium-sized town has one or more, and even a small country with a population of one million has more than 425 such geniuses.

Now, in a population with a mean IQ of 70, which naïve interpretation of the Flynn effect would deem our grandparents to have had, genius-level IQs of 150 would be 5 1/3 standard deviations above the mean and occur, on average, in only one out of 20,396,324 people. If we take the Flynn effect as 3 IQ points per decade, then we'd expect a mean IQ of 70 around the year 1900. In 1900, the world population was about 1.7 thousand million, which would imply there were only 80 people with genius-level IQs in the entire world of 1900. The merest glance at the history of that era will reveal how ridiculous a supposition this is.

For the “Flynn effect” ideas and thoughts here is a link to the drop in IQ - Global IQ: 1950–2050