Saturday, July 11, 2015
Dawkins the Dunce
Contra Dawkins, you don't have to give an explanation for your explanation if your explanation explains what needs explaining and you give reasons for believing it is the best explanation. Got it?
You can give more detailed reasons for believing a cosmological argument shows God must exist as ultimate explanation, of course, but as a point of logic, when it comes to inferring design only, you don't have to provide anything more for it to be a good inference.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
If the post you are commenting on is more than 30 days old, your comment will have to await approval before being published. Rest assured, however, that as long as it is not spam, it will be published in due time.