Monday, March 11, 2013

The Filibuster Against Murder

Last Tuesday, Senator Rand Paul filibustered the nomination of John Brennan as CIA director.  This was not unusual as I recall Democratic Senators filibustered (or threatened to) judicial appointments under President George Bush (because democracy needs to be overridden by the court system populated by Leftist Statists).  What was different about this filibuster was that it was a real filibuster, in that Senator Rand Paul stood and talked for 13 hours.

He didn’t do this because he hated John Brennan.  He did this because John Brennan was the grandfather of the use of military drones and he wanted to highlight the current presidential regime’s use of them.  Recall that a couple of years ago, President Obama approved drone strikes that killed Anwar al-Awlaki and his 16-year-old son Abdulrahman al-Awlaki.   The father was accused of colluding with terrorists in order to attack the United States.  Really all they could possibly pin on him was the Fort Hood shootings as he was the cleric allegedly in contact with the deranged shooter.  His son was another problem entirely.

His son, you see, was taken out because the CIA feared that he might join up with terrorists following his father’s death.  In other words, not only did the Obama administration act as judge, jury, and executioner in killing Anwar al-Awlaki, who they charged with riding in the wrong SUV in Yemen, but they also charged his son with pre-crime and summarily executed him as well.  The United States Federal government murdered two American citizens on foreign soil because of either what they might have done or what they might have done.

What does this have to do with the filibuster?  Well, Senator Rand Paul asked Attorney General Eric Holder if he believed the President had the power to murder assassinate Americans on US soil with drone attacks if they are deemed to be terrorists (or, as Homeland Security Secretary Miss Hardcastle Janet Napolitano would label them: war veterans and libertarians).

The response he got was vague, wordy, and ambiguous at best.  You know, the kind of bullshit lawyer-speak we all get from time to time from people.  And so, without a real answer from the Whitehouse, Senator Paul took to the Senate floor and stood for the most basic right of every person: the right to life.

You see, the President wants full authority to murder people like you and me.  It doesn’t matter what ideology you possess or how much in the inner circle you are, if a man has the authority to kill other people without any check in place, he is effectively the dictator of the realm he oversees.  There is nothing more coercive than having your life threatened.

Of course, the Democrats (mostly), the Republicans (mostly), and just about everyone in this country don’t see it that way.  Like Federal tax dollars going to Planned Parenthood (which never, ever, ever go to abortions**wink, wink**), everyone assumes that such power will be used on the “right” people and never themselves.

Because it can’t happen here.

1 comment:

  1. Good for you for writing this, and good for Rand Paul for standing up for what he strongly believes in. I shall be returning here to check on further posts.



If the post you are commenting on is more than 30 days old, your comment will have to await approval before being published. Rest assured, however, that as long as it is not spam, it will be published in due time.

Related Posts with Thumbnails